AdvertiseDonate
LatestRevere resident: 97-year-old Maria O’Callaghan dies after six decades of marriage
Digital Newz Live · 126 Brookline Avenue, 2nd Floor, Boston, MA 02215

One Senator Steps Back: Steele-John Absent From Parliament Amid 2025 Probe

The Western Australian Greens senator will skip next week's sitting to focus on an independent review of misconduct claims, which he has firmly denied.

By Carolina Wood ·

Illustration for: One Senator Steps Back: Steele-John Absent From Parliament Amid 2025 Probe
Illustration generated for this article, not a news photograph.

Jordon Steele-John, the Western Australian Greens senator, confirmed on Saturday that he will not attend parliament next week. The decision comes as the 32 year old legislator apologizes for publicly sharing a confidential letter containing allegations against him. While he maintains that he denies every claim made in the document, he is stepping back to allow an independent investigation to proceed without disruption to the Senate proceedings.

The immediate trigger for his absence was a social media post deleted on Saturday afternoon. In that post, Steele-John had shared a three page letter previously sent to Greens leader David Shoebridge. The senator explained that he saw the full letter circulating online and wanted to avoid the appearance of hiding from the information. He admitted uncertainty about whether publishing it was the right move, stating that he was sorry for any additional stress the action caused.

Key to this story are the specific allegations outlined in the letter dated 13 October. The document, initially published by the Nine newspapers, cites multiple claims of serious misconduct regarding his behavior in the presence of women between 2017 and 2025. One specific instance involves a reported case of sexual harassment at a Greens campaign event in 2024. The authors noted that the alleged victim had not reported the incident to authorities due to a fear of backlash.

The letter also references an allegation of serious sexual misconduct in 2025. Steele-John has stated that this particular claim was raised by a former partner and was investigated by Western Australian police. The police investigation was closed in May with a finding of no charges laid. The authors of the letter emphasized that an allegation does not equate to fact or guilt, but argued that the party’s interest lay in thoroughly investigating every claim.

Context for this development involves a recent public dispute between Steele-John and party leader David Shoebridge. The disagreement centered on whether the senator was on official leave during the investigation. Shoebridge stated that Steele-John requested leave and that he accepted it last week after seven party members urged an inquiry. The senator has denied agreeing to take leave, noting that he was told joining Senate estimates virtually would also be unacceptable. He pointed to a growing chorus of voices calling for him to stay away, suggesting a precedent had been set for keeping parliamentarians out after allegations.

In a statement posted late Friday and since deleted, Steele-John said he would concentrate on seeing the independent investigation through to its conclusion. The complaints are now the subject of a review commissioned by the WA Greens and have been referred to the Independent Parliamentary Standards Commission. The senator rejected the claims in a lengthy statement last Sunday, accusing an unofficial faction within the WA branch of leaking the letter. He described the leak as an attempt to remove him from the Senate and accused the group of playing nasty political games.

The letter also highlighted a disparaging nickname given to the senator, described as a reputation for inappropriate behavior. The authors stressed their belief in a fair and thorough process. Steele-John has said any claims about his behavior should be investigated fairly and thoroughly. For the rest of the year, his attendance at parliament remains in doubt as he navigates this complex procedural and personal challenge.

The situation highlights the ongoing tension between political accountability and the rights of the accused in the Australian parliament. With the Independent Parliamentary Standards Commission now involved, the focus shifts from internal party politics to a broader institutional review. Steele-John’s decision to step back aims to minimize distractions while the facts are determined, ensuring that working families and voters see a process that is both rigorous and transparent.

More Politics · World news · Report a business · Got a Story?

Get Digital Newz Live in your inboxHeadlines from coast to coast. Free, a few times a week, unsubscribe any time.

Related stories

Get Digital Newz Live in your inboxHeadlines from coast to coast. Free, a few times a week, unsubscribe any time.