AdvertiseDonate
LatestRevere resident: 97-year-old Maria O’Callaghan dies after six decades of marriage
Digital Newz Live · 126 Brookline Avenue, 2nd Floor, Boston, MA 02215

Ukraine drone defense: Starshield speed cap cost two lives

Ukrainian officials confirmed that satellite throttling disabled high-speed interceptors during Russian attacks, resulting in two deaths and at least 17 injuries before access was restored.

By Thomas Obasi ·

Illustration for: Ukraine drone defense: Starshield speed cap cost two lives
Illustration generated for this article, not a news photograph.

Two Ukrainian soldiers died and at least 17 others were injured after Starshield, the military version of SpaceX's Starlink network, throttled terminals moving above specific speed limits last week. The restrictions disabled Ukrainian interceptors tasked with countering Russian bomb-carrying drones. With those assets offline at high speed, Russian forces found it easier to strike Ukraine's energy infrastructure.

Ukrainian military leaders stated they received no advance notice of the changes. President Volodymyr Zelenskyy characterized the move as a direct message from the United States, a signal sent as tensions escalated between him and President Donald Trump. Public criticism followed quickly, targeting both Trump for perceived abandonment of Ukraine and SpaceX CEO Elon Musk for facilitating the shift.

Accounting for the decision has shifted since the incident. Musk initially stated that SpaceX does not control Starshield, claiming the US military makes such determinations. The White House later denied taking action. Subsequent reports indicated that Musk proposed the slowdown to Trump, who accepted it. Later accounts suggested Musk ordered the restrictions independently. Access to the service in Ukraine has since been restored.

Ukraine relies heavily on US technology for its defense. Access to satellite coverage has been limited before, such as in 2022 when coverage was not extended to support a counterattack in Crimea. Wendy Whitman Cobb of the School of Advanced Air and Space Studies at Maxwell Air Force Base said SpaceX effectively holds a monopoly on launch. She noted that rivals like United Launch Alliance, Blue Origin, and Rocket Lab exist but lack comparable frequency, mass, scale, or cost efficiency.

Oğuz Karasu of the Oxford Space Initiative described the monopoly as practical rather than legal. He noted that launch constitutes about 8 percent of the space industry, but the remainder of the sector cannot function without it. SpaceX has deployed more than 10,000 Starlink satellites in low Earth orbit using Falcon 9 rockets. Andrew Reddie of the University of California, Berkeley, called the situation an antitrust issue, observing that SpaceX launches support constellations it owns, reducing incentives to launch competing systems.

Experts warned that the stakes extend to daily life through GPS and satellite communications. Whitman Cobb noted that a GPS outage could affect fuel pumps, ATMs, financial transactions, and ambulance dispatch. SpaceX is reportedly retiring the Falcon 9 rocket and taking no new missions from 2028. This leaves the Space Force struggling to find launch options for military satellites and raises questions about NASA's future access to the Crew Dragon capsule.

Reddie stated that the central security problem is that a non-state actor is making decisions as if it were a government. Michele Scataglini of the Oxford Space Initiative called the episode a global wake-up call. She warned that one firm could decide which countries get access to space, particularly in the Global South.

More News · Tech news · Report a business · Got a Story?

Get Digital Newz Live in your inboxHeadlines from coast to coast. Free, a few times a week, unsubscribe any time.

Related stories

Get Digital Newz Live in your inboxHeadlines from coast to coast. Free, a few times a week, unsubscribe any time.